The wish to offer attractive principal-protected products while in a low-interest-rate environment prompted the proliferation of custom indexes and their inclusion in insurance products over the last decade. Most notably, in fixed indexed annuities (FIAs) we saw a persistent shift of premium allocations from benchmark indexes such as the S&P 500 to custom risk control indexes.
With the increased use of these novel, sometimes complex indexes, there are still misperceptions concerning how they work.
Recent lawsuits around annuities using custom indexes have sparked debate about sales practices and tools available to demonstrate performance and understand the functionality of these indexes, on their own and within annuity products. The roles and responsibilities of index providers, insurance carriers, advisors and ultimately end clients enter the discussion as well.
As a contribution to this debate, let’s take the opportunity to try to dispel some misperceptions concerning not only custom indexes themselves, but more importantly, their role when used in FIAs.
No Active Management, No Fiduciary
The first point to make is that a custom index is fundamentally different from an actively managed fund. With a custom index, there is no portfolio manager making decisions regarding composition, allocations or weightings through time.
Instead, a custom index is calculated according to a predetermined set of rules. The index provider sets these rules at the inception of the index and ensures the rules are followed thereafter. So, a custom index is in essence non-discretionary.
The index provider does, however, have a high-level responsibility to ensure that the index continues to meet its objectives over the years. To this end, index providers reserve the right to step in and exercise discretion to fix problems. But the index provider is not a fiduciary, and a custom index is not actively managed.
However, because the index is rules-based, the investment process is, in principle, fully transparent, meaning it can be replicated. This is in contrast to an actively managed fund, which is often opaque with no insight into the actions of a portfolio manager.
Another significant distinction is the absence of “style drift.” The way an index selects and allocates to different assets and asset classes is solely driven by the index rules. For example, if you chose an index because it selects low-volatility stocks, you will always get that, and never highly volatile growth stocks.
One potential source of confusion may be that many indexes are provided by large asset managers and banks that have asset management operations. But a custom index from such a provider is not to be confused with any fiduciary asset management services they may offer.
Receive Updates
Share to Social
Show Sponsors
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley SaundersWhere Do Annuities Fit in Your Client’s Retirement Strategy?
In the current interest rate environment, exchanging an old annuity for a new one may be a wise move, according to some experts. But there are caveats and exceptions.
As a strategy, annuity swapping “can make a lot of sense right now,” said David Lau, founder and CEO of DPL Financial Partners, an RIA consultant network in Louisville, Ky., that specializes in low-cost, commission-free annuities. “But care needs to be taken to review individual situations.”
The Case For Exchanging Annuities
The case for an annuity upgrade is pretty simple: Higher interest rates mean higher payouts for many types of annuities.
Fixed annuities, which pay a set amount over a specified time period, are most directly tied to prevailing interest rates. But variable annuities (VAs), which invest in mutual-fund-like subaccounts that rise and fall with the stock market, offer optional “living benefit” riders such as lifetime income guarantees (for an extra fee) that typically become more generous with higher interest rates.
In addition, many fixed-indexed annuities (FIAs), which reward annuity holders with a percentage of an index’s gains in exchange for complete downside protection, and registered index linked annuities (RILAs), which are VAs that credit a higher percentage of investment gains while providing a degree of downside protection, tend to increase the percentage of gains that are credited to the account, when interest rates move up.
Before a client rushes to upgrade an old annuity, though, be aware that it might be pointless. “Many fixed annuities will renew into the higher current rates automatically, so a new policy may not be necessary to benefit from today’s higher rates,” said Lau.
Surrender Charges
Another caveat concerns “surrender charges.” Most annuities have a “surrender period” of six to eight years after purchase, during which you cannot sell or take a substantial withdrawal without incurring a hefty fee.
Early-surrender charges would reduce the value of exchanging for a higher paying contract. But that’s not necessarily prohibitive. “It may be worth paying the charge if there is a large enough difference in return,” said Michael Finke, professor and Frank M. Engle chair of economic security at The American College of Financial Services in King of Prussia, Penn.
Surrender charges often decline over time as well, so the older the annuity the smaller the hurdle.
Careful analysis should determine whether swapping for a new annuity is cost-effective. “For lifetime income [annuities], look at the amount of lifetime income the current contract provides versus how much lifetime income could be provided by moving the contract value, net of surrender charges, to a new annuity with a higher payout rate,” said Wade Pfau, Dallas-based co-founder of RISA (Retirement Income Style Awareness) and author of Retirement Planning Guidebook, in an email. “If the new guaranteed income is greater, it might be worth doing.”
Beware Market Value Adjustments
But with annuities, nothing is ever quite so simple. “Even if you have a no- or low-surrender-fee annuity, there could still be a market value adjustment,” said David Blanchett, Lexington, Ky.-based head of retirement research at PGIM, the investment management group of Prudential.
When you buy an annuity, he explained, the insurance company that issued it invests the lion’s share of your premium in bonds. Today, with higher interest rates, those older bonds are devalued. Therefore, if you surrender your old annuity now, it might trade in for less than when you bought it.
“You should expect to get less than you put in,” he said.
A Potential Opportunity
Nevertheless, the exchange still might pay off.
“Much like a decision whether or not to refinance a mortgage, it comes down to the cost to exit the old versus the time to realize the advantages of the new,” said Frank O’Connor, vice president of research at the Insured Retirement Institute in Washington, D.C.
But American College’s Finke notes that salespeople are encouraged to help clients evaluate the benefit of comparison shopping. “Commission-compensated agents are incentivized to recommend switching to more attractively priced products,” he said.
Record Sales—From New Buyers
So far, however, most clients don’t seem to be upgrading their annuities.
“As rates have increased, we’ve seen protected accumulation and income solutions like annuities provide increased value relative to other financial products, which has attracted new customers,” said Scott Gaul, head of individual retirement at Prudential Financial in Newark, N.J.
Higher interest rates have driven record-breaking annuity sales, according to data tracker Limra. But most of that has come from new buyers, not trade-ins.
“We have looked at this extensively, and we do not see signals of significant exchange activity in the market,” said Todd Giesing, assistant vice president and head of Limra Annuity Research in Windsor, Conn.
Receive Updates
Share to Social
Show Sponsors
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley SaundersIt May Be Time To Swap The Old Annuity For A New One, Experts Say
Retirement Income Style Awareness Profile matches client preferences
with income solutionsLOUISVILLE, KY, April 25, 2023 /24-7PressRelease/ — DPL Financial Partners, the leading insurance platform for registered investment advisors (RIAs), announced that it has expanded access to the Retirement Income Style Awareness (RISA®) Profile to all its members.Retirement researchers Wade Pfau and Alex Murguia created the RISA Profile — a psychology-based income personality assessment — to help reveal an individual’s unique preferences for sourcing retirement income.
“The RISA is changing the retirement income conversation for advisors and their clients,” said Murguia. “With DPL, we have a partner to bring the RISA Profile to more RIAs and clients looking for personalized retirement income solutions. We’ve gotten great feedback from DPL members so far and will continue to learn from their experiences as we develop the RISA marketplace.”
Completed in just 15-20 minutes, the RISA questionnaire generates a custom report that guides advisors in delivering tailored retirement income solutions, including fiduciary friendly annuities. DPL rolled out an initial release of the RISA to a small group of members last fall.
“It’s important to align clients with strategies that work for their unique personalities,” said DPL member and financial advisor Bob Witt, who took part in the initial rollout. “The solution that looks best on paper might not be one they’re able to stick with during tough times.”
Advisors typically use RISA as a first step in the planning process, to validate current plans ― especially during market uncertainty ― and to attract new clients by showing they care about their clients’ unique preferences for how to meet their goals.
“We’re excited to add the RISA to our expanding toolkit for members,” said DPL Founder and CEO David Lau. “The combination of RISA’s client-level insights and DPL’s commission-free annuity solutions empowers advisors to deliver customized income strategies that are resonating with clients and reflecting a fiduciary approach to retirement planning.”
When RISA results indicate a need for guaranteed income, asset protection or a mix of the two, DPL members have access to a marketplace of vetted, fee-only annuity solutions to fulfill the strategy. The RISA Profile is now available to all DPL members through dplfp.com.
About DPL Financial Partners
DPL Financial Partners is the leading insurance marketplace bringing best-in-class solutions from the nation’s top carriers to registered investment advisors (RIAs), their clients and consumers. DPL’s products, proprietary tools and embedded technology enable RIAs to incorporate insurance and annuities into their practices to more holistically serve their clients. Clients benefit from products that offer competitive pricing and transparent, fiduciary implementation to meet a range of needs in the financial plan. www.dplfp.com
About RISA
RISA, the Retirement Income Style Awareness profile, is built on a retirement income framework that blends psychology and financial planning to help investors identify their unique retirement income preferences. Developed by retirement income experts Alex Murguia and Wade Pfau, the intuitive, easy-to-follow survey considers a variety of factors related to an individual’s feelings about security, flexibility, reliance on market returns, and preference for contractual guarantees to define their tolerance for income risk during decumulation. The RISA empowers financial advisors with the insights they need to implement the retirement income strategies that make the most sense for each individual client. https://risaprofile.com/
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley SaundersDPL rolls out member-wide access to RISA planning tool
A new paper published in the January 2023 edition of the Journal of Financial Planning by Wade Pfau and Steve Parrish asks a question that is of paramount importance for financial advisors and their clients: Which Social Security claiming strategy generates the highest legacy value?
Parrish is an independent consultant, an adjunct professor at Drake University and The American College of Financial Services, and co-director of the American College Center for Retirement Income. Pfau is a professor of retirement income and director of the Retirement Income Certified Professional program at The American College of Financial Services.
As Pfau and Parrish note, the issue of when and how to claim Social Security is as important today as it has ever been for the typical retirement investor. On the one hand, other sources of guaranteed retirement income have diminished in prevalence, especially employer-sponsored defined benefit pensions. On the other, the average life expectancy for healthy Americans continues to rise, putting additional pressure on the typical retiree’s nest egg.
With such questions hanging in the air, Pfau and Parrish use a model based on historical return data to explore whether claiming benefits at age 62 leads to greater wealth at death compared with delaying Social Security benefits until age 67 or 70. In almost all cases, the pair finds, delaying payments is the superior method if one’s goal is to maximize wealth.
Faith in the Markets
According to Pfau and Parrish, there are significant and well-understood benefits to delaying Social Security. For example, monthly benefits will be as much as 77% larger in inflation-adjusted terms for those who claim at 70 instead of 62.
Still, many individuals decide to claim earlier for a variety of reasons. In some cases, Pfau and Parrish write, these early benefits selections are related to the individual’s personal situation. Some may feel they need the income to support their spending needs, or they have a medical condition that is expected to shorten their life expectancy. As Pfau and Parrish write, such choices are perfectly rational and may result in “better” outcomes for certain subsections of the U.S. retiree population.
However, there are also many individuals and couples who appear to have sufficient resources to cover their spending needs without relying on Social Security — but they claim early anyway. As the new analysis and prior research shows, this group is sizable, with only about one in 10 Americans saying they plan to delay Social Security until age 70.
Pfau and Parrish find that one common early-claiming motivator is the idea that individuals should claim benefits as early as possible in order to leave more of their assets invested in the market. In other words, they believe that the receipt of Social Security benefits will allow them to withdraw less from their investment accounts to support their retirement spending needs.
Does It Work?
Using historical return data, Pfau and Parrish directly tackle the question of whether claiming benefits at age 62 leads to greater wealth at death compared to delaying Social Security benefits until age 67 or 70. The pair use assumptions about life expectancy, current wealth and spending needs that reflect the current U.S. retiree population.
In crunching the numbers, the researchers find that delaying Social Security typically leads to higher amounts of wealth at death than claiming it at age 62, refuting the claim that it is a good idea to start Social Security benefits early just to keep more dollars invested in the market.
he percentage of cases where the legacy amount is greater when claiming at 67 or 70 compared to 62 ranged from about 60% to almost 97%.
According to the analysis, one key variable in the outcome of any given scenario being tested is the assumed allocation to stocks.
Specifically, the early claiming strategy tended to fare better with higher stock allocations. Similarly and as expected, the results of the market-based approach are superior when stock market returns are strongest in the years between when the individual turned 62 and 70.
As the researchers explain, the role of sequence of returns risk is key in the analysis. Those individuals who are lucky enough to experience strong returns early in their retirement years will end up with greater lifetime wealth, but the strategy is a risky one, as the percentages above demonstrate. As a purely logical exercise, Pfau and Parrish find, delayed claiming is the proven method for maximizing wealth.
More About the Math
According to Pfau and Parrish, the “internal rate of return” on delaying Social Security is actually a very favorable real return. They note that separate research has shown that those who delay claiming until age 70 and reach age 90 can generate the equivalent of a 5% real rate of return on what is essentially a government-backed bond.
Further, delaying Social Security benefits also tends to reduce the chances that an individual will run out of money before death, providing an additional benefit to this strategy.
Ultimately, Pfau and Parrish argue, the key point is that the guaranteed return provided by delaying Social Security is a highly compelling benefit for those who have the means to delay claiming. It effectively competes with the returns of all but the most aggressive (and lucky) investment portfolios.
And, as Pfau’s and Parrish’s work shows, waiting to claim benefits can not only reduce the chances that an individual will run out of money during their lifetimes, but it also increases the likelihood that they will be able to leave more assets.
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Nick DesrocherWhy Clients Shouldn’t Claim Social Security Early to Protect Portfolios
The majority of Americans don’t have much faith in the future of Social Security. A recent GOBankingRates survey found that 46% of Americans believe the program will offer a lot less than it does today by the time they retire, and 23% believe the program won’t exist at all by the time they retire. Yet despite this, most Americans plan to depend on Social Security to fund at least some of their retirement — 26% said they plan to use Social Security to fund less than half of it, but 51% said they plan to depend on it to fund more than half (31%) or all (20%) of their retirement.
Can Americans Rely on Social Security as It Stands To Fund Their Retirement?
“With the rise of inflation and the overall cost of living, unless you can truly stick to a budget — which in my experience most people don’t — Social Security is not sufficient for most retirement expenses,” said Frank Murillo, partner and managing director at Snowden Lane Partners.
“What people envision spending in retirement and what they actually spend are two different things,” he continued. “With the clients I work with, we go through an exercise I call ‘recreating the dollar’ where we piece together sources of income to mimic what they had through their working years. Then we stretch that for a reasonable time span, and the results of what they can actually spend are eye-opening.”
Social Security was never meant to be a retiree’s only source of retirement income, said Wade Pfau, co-director of the Retirement Income Center at The American College of Financial Services.
“It is meant to replace about 40% of the average indexed lifetime earnings of someone who worked and earned an average wage over their lifetime,” he said. “Many retirees will seek to replace a higher percentage than this.”
Most experts suggest aiming to plan for retirement income that is at least 70% of your pre-retirement income.
“Since Social Security is likely to make up only a portion of your retirement income, it is important to have a well-rounded strategy to meet your income needs in retirement,” said Katherine Tierney, CFA, senior retirement strategist at Edward Jones. “We recommend you act now to understand what you need to do to achieve your ideal retirement. If you’re unsure where to start, a financial advisor can help you outline your goals, develop a strategy to meet them and measure your progress along the way.”
What To Do If You Must Rely on Social Security To Fund Your Retirement
Although financial experts do not recommend living on Social Security alone, for many Americans, this is their only source of retirement income. The GOBankingRates survey found that 25% of Americans have not started saving for retirement and that 36% have less than $10,000 saved.
“Each situation is unique and some people can live on Social Security only,” said Colleen Carcone, director of wealth planning strategies at TIAA. “If your only source of income is Social Security, remember that continuing to work and delaying the start of your Social Security benefits can close the gap [between how much you need for retirement and how much you have saved] because a delay would mean a bigger check when you do start.”
What Will Social Security Look Like in the Future?
As the survey found, most Americans believe that Social Security benefits will be reduced or cease to exist in the coming decades. As it stands, the Social Security trust fund is set to run out in 2035, so are these concerns warranted?
Most experts believe Social Security will continue to exist, but to keep it going will likely require some changes in the current program.
“There are a few simple solutions that will likely occur,” said Jeremy Finger, CFP, founder of Riverbend Wealth Management. “First, we could eliminate the earnings cap on Social Security tax so that all income above $147,000 is taxed. This could extend the Social Security trust fund. Second, [the Social Security Administration could] increase the full retirement age, which is kind of a pay cut. For example, people who were born after 1970 may not able to get full benefits until age 68 or 69. Third, [they could] increase the payroll tax on Social Security.”
One or a combination of these solutions should balance the Social Security trust fund, Finger said. However, because there are a lot of unknowns, Finger does not recommend relying on Social Security to fund your retirement.
“I would not advise clients to make their Social Security decisions based on what the government may do,” he said.
No matter how the Social Security trust ends up being funded — and most experts believe this will happen before it gets depleted — there is a chance that benefits will be reduced in the coming years.
“Social Security could be reduced to match incoming revenue from individuals and their employers,” Carcone said.
The uncertainty surrounding the future of Social Security should be taken into account when retirement planning.
“While most advisors consider current funding estimates as provided by the Social Security Administration for retirement planning, one should consider possible changes to the system,” said Wendy S. Baum, a financial advisor with Equitable Advisors. “The more saved over time with pension strategies and portfolio building, the less reliant one will be on Social Security benefits.”
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Nick DesrocherMost Americans Plan To Rely Heavily on Social Security for Retirement — Here’s What To Know
We often hear stories about retirees sharing money mistakes they regret in retirement. Looking at the flip side of the coin, what are some financial moves retirees almost never regret?
Working With a Financial Professional
It is incredibly rare for a retiree to regret working alongside a trusted and qualified financial advisor or planner for their retirement needs. These individuals, after all, are here to look out for the retiree’s best interests.Kurt Heineman, financial planner at Vision Casting Financial Planning, uses the example of rising interest rates in the current economy. Financial planners can help retirees think about ways to make low-risk returns on cash they may be holding for short or intermediate purposes they might not be aware of if they were working on their own.“It can be very reassuring to have a retirement plan and someone who will walk alongside you as you transition into retirement,” Heineman said. “Financial planners can help retirees build, monitor and manage a financial plan which can lead to peace so you can enjoy the retirement you worked hard for.”
Planning When To Claim Social Security
According to the Social Security Administration (SSA), retirees at age 62 are eligible to start claiming Social Security. Some retirees may decide to delay retirement until age 70 to receive the full benefit amount.It is often quite difficult to determine the right timing for Social Security, and retirees rarely regret carefully considering when they will claim Social Security to receive a financial boost. Wade Pfau, professor of retirement income at The American College of Financial Services, said claiming Social Security does not have to happen at the same time you retire.“A thoughtful claiming strategy could add more than $100,000 of lifetime benefits to a retirement plan,” Pfau said.
Using Proper Annuity Solutions
Mark Kennedy, founder and president of Kennedy Wealth Management LLC, specializes in helping people who are within reach of retirement or who are already in retirement. The primary money move Kennedy’s clients never forget is building in guaranteed lifetime income and guaranteed growth using the proper fixed index annuity solutions with lifetime income riders.While the market is down everywhere, Kennedy said the lifetime income for retirees is not. Many advisors lean predominantly on the stock and bond markets to provide their clients with incomes for life, but Kennedy recommends taking the time to understand the proper and correct annuity solutions and weaving them into a client’s overall retirement income plan.“I can’t tell you how many clients I’ve spoken to on client review calls this year and they always say, ‘I’m glad you encouraged me to go with that annuity. It’s a lifesaver,’” Kennedy said.
Maxing Out Their Roth IRA
For those who qualify, Rafael Rubio, president of Stable Retirement Planners, said retirees who max out their Roth IRA as opposed to a traditional IRA benefit in retirement. This gives retirees a bucket of tax-free assets they can pull from or create tax-free supplemental income.
Maxing Out Their 401(k)
Retirees who work for companies where employer-sponsored retirement plans are offered, like a 401(k), rarely regret taking the opportunity to max out their contributions. The earlier one can start doing this, and prioritizing contributions throughout their working career, the better especially if you contribute at a level your employer is willing to match.“Doing this almost always gives retirees more options on how to live their lives in retirement,” said Eric M. Jaffe, CEO and founder of Mosaic Wealth Partners. “Typically, it provides greater peace of mind when retirees have adequate funds available in retirement to maintain their desired lifestyle.”
Diversifying Investment Vehicles
Most retirees never regret planning ahead for retirement to meet their goals and investing early to reap the benefits of compound interest. Another money move retirees seldom regret is diversifying their savings and investment vehicles. This includes accounts like IRAs, Roth IRAs, employer-sponsored retirement plans and general accounts that do not necessarily have particular tax efficiencies under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.“Each of these accounts has different contribution limits and availability as well as varying tax ramifications while saving and also while distributing funds in retirement,” Jaffe said. “For most retirees, having different buckets from which to distribute assets in retirement with varying tax consequences when doing so proves to be beneficial.”
Eliminating Debt
Steve Sexton, CEO of Sexton Advisory Group, said eliminating debt before you retire does more than prepare you to make a smoother transition into the next chapter. It enables you to earn interest rather than paying interest.“Many people carry high-interest rate evolving debt, which means your expenses go up when interest rates go up – making your monthly budget unpredictable in retirement,” Sexton said.Whether you’re planning for retirement or in a completely different chapter of your life, nobody who has ever eliminated debt, like student loans, car payments or mortgages, can say they regret not being in debt. Focus on paying off any existing debt, or paying in full on any big expenses, prior to retirement, before you decide to retire.
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley Saunders7 Money Moves Retirees Almost Never Regret
Sequence of returns risk — defined as a risk of receiving lower or negative returns early during a time when withdrawals are made from an investment portfolio — is harming the ability for many seniors to retire when they initially planned to, throwing actual retirement dates into doubt as people everywhere continue to reckon with historic levels of inflation and economic volatility.
This is according to a column published by Forbes and written by retirement financing columnist Bob Carlson.
“About 48% of people who were planning to retire in 2022 are putting their plans on hold or reconsidering them, according to a recent survey taken by Quicken,” Carlson writes. “Another 22% of people who were planning to retire sometime after 2022 are considering delaying their retirement dates.”
An additional survey conducted by BlackRock indicated that the number of respondents reporting that retirement plans were “on track” declined by 5% to 63% compared to the same period one year earlier, with another 42% of respondents describing that retirement plans were altered by the ravages of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic.
“We’re living through an example of sequence of returns risk and how it can arise quickly and unexpectedly,” he writes. “Many people build their retirement plans on long-term average financial data or on the assumption that recent performance will continue indefinitely. Events often don’t unfold that way. The long-term average of stock index returns is the result of years of very different returns. It’s a rare year when the return of an index is close to its long-term average. In most years the return of an index is very different from the long-term average.”
In the past, sequence of returns risk has been a commonly-discussed retirement risk during times of market volatility by Wade Pfau, professor of retirement income at the American College of Financial Services and founder of RetirementResearcher.com. Pfau has previously described how a reverse mortgage has the potential to help someone at or near retirement avoid sequence of returns risk if a borrower taps a standby line of credit until the market — and their investments — stabilize.
“Even if the overall market recovers, a retiree spending from their portfolio might not get to enjoy that recovery,” Pfau explained in a 2020 episode of The RMD Podcast. “And that sequence of returns risk amplifies the impact of investment volatility. So, that’s where a reverse mortgage can fit into this in a number of different ways to help alleviate that risk on the investment portfolio.”
Read the Forbes column on current levels of sequence of returns risk.
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley SaundersForbes: Sequence of returns risk is ‘upending’ retirement
When it comes to planning for retirement income, clients face a number of risks. Each risk requires the right set of tools to manage it. And each client has their own retirement income style, which dictates the type of strategy needed to properly fund the client’s post-employment years.
How to match the right retirement income strategy to the client’s retirement income style was discussed by Wade Pfau, professor of retirement income at The American College, and Alex Murguia, CEO of RISA, during a recent webinar by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
Retirement spending strategies
Pfau described four basic strategies to fund essential and discretionary spending in retirement:
Total return approach, in which a retiree holds an aggressive, diversified portfolio and takes systematic withdrawals from it.
Risk wrap strategy, which has a lifetime income floor built into it to fund essential spending but uses an annuity to fund discretionary spending.
Income protection strategy, in which a floor of essential income is built and then investing for discretionary spending.
Time segmentation or bucketing strategy, in which funds are invested in different vehicles for short-term and long-term spending.
A client’s style leads to specific strategies, Pfau said. He identified the dimensions that best capture a client’s retirement income style:
Probability based versus safety first.
Optionality versus commitment orientation.
A client who is probability based depends on market growth through the risk premium for stocks to outperform bonds. Clients who prefer a safety-first strategy rely on funding their essential needs with safer income such as that generated by annuities or bonds.
Clients also vary on how much plan optionality they prefer, Pfau said.
Some clients prefer flexibility to keep their options open and take advantage of new opportunities. Other clients prefer to lock in a solution that solves a lifetime income need.
RISA created a matrix that shows a role for retirement income investments based on a client’s retirement income style.
Choosing an approach
Clients who are commitment-oriented and prefer a safety-first approach need a protected income have a protected income style. Clients who have a commitment-oriented and probability-based approach are more likely to be served with a risk wrap income style. Those who want to combine optionality with a safety-first approach would most likely benefit from a time segmentation income style. A total return approach would be the best bet for clients who want optionality along with a probability-based approach.
What role do annuities play in these different approaches? Pfau explained that some approaches use annuities more for income and other approaches use annuities for growth.
In the commitment-oriented approaches, single premium immediate annuities, deferred income annuities, fixed indexed annuities, registered index-linked annuities and variable annuities can provide income. In the optionality-oriented approaches, FIAs and RILAs, as well as multiyear guaranteed annuities and investment-only variable annuities can provide growth.
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley Saunders4 retirement income strategies to match any client’s style
If you have a reverse mortgage, it affects how much you can leave your heirs
Your home may be your most valuable asset and represent the largest portion of your estate. A reverse mortgage can help you hang onto that asset, by letting you tap into your accumulated home equity without having to sell the home. Still, the money you receive from the reverse mortgage will also have to be repaid after you die, reducing the value of your estate, possibly substantially. Here is what you need to know about reverse mortgages and estate planning.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
If you have a reverse mortgage on your home, it will have to be paid off after you die, reducing the home’s value to your heirs.
The rules are different for spouses who inherit homes with reverse mortgages than for other heirs.
A reverse mortgage could allow you to supplement your retirement income without drawing down other assets in your estate.
What Happens to Your Reverse Mortgage After You Die?
When you leave a home with a reverse mortgage to someone, you’re also leaving them with responsibility for the mortgage. What they’ll need to do next depends on their relationship to you.
If Your Heir Is Your Spouse
Spouses who inherit a home with a reverse mortgage fall into three groups. Which group your spouse is in will determine whether they have a right to stay in the home and possibly continue to receive benefits from the reverse mortgage.
Co-borrowing spouse – A co-borrowing spouse is listed as such on the original loan documents. Any co-borrower (they don’t have to be your spouse) can stay in the home and continue to receive money from the reverse mortgage.
Eligible non-borrowing spouse – Spouses who didn’t qualify to be co-borrowers (typically because they were under age 62 when the loan was issued) can be listed on the mortgage as eligible non-borrowing spouses. If they meet certain other requirements, they can also remain in the home, but they won’t receive additional money from the reverse mortgage.
Ineligible non-borrowing spouse – Such spouses don’t meet the requirements for one of the first two categories. They must buy the home themselves if they wish to remain in it. They can also sell it.1
In the case of co-borrowing or eligible non-borrowing spouses, the home and reverse mortgage become part of their estate when they die.
If you leave your home to your children or other heirs who are not your spouse, they will not be eligible to keep the reverse mortgage; instead, they must pay it off within a specified time frame. Essentially, they will have three choices:
Sell the home –After they pay off the mortgage, anyequity that remains is theirs to keep.
Buy the home –They can also pay off the reverse mortgage with their own funds if they want to keep the home.
Deed the home over to the lender – This way of settling the debt is known as a “deed in lieu of foreclosure.”3
Fortunately, no matter how much you owe on a HECM, your heirs won’t be stuck with a net debt. The most they’re obligated to pay is either the full loan balance or 95% of the home’s appraised value, whichever is less. The FHA insurance will cover any difference.4
Your heirs may have to take action fairly quickly. Technically, they have only 30 days from receiving a due and payable notice from the lender, although they can ask for an extension of up to a year to give them time to sell the home or arrange for financing to buy it themselves.5 Which course they are likely to follow will depend on a variety of factors, including how attached they are to the home and how much debt it carries.
One suggestion you may see online is to use some of the proceeds of the reverse mortgage to buy a life insurance policy made payable to your heirs. This could provide them with sufficient cash to purchase the home after your death. However, you may need all the money you receive from the reverse mortgage to cover your living expenses and not have any left over to buy life insurance, which can also be costly in your later years. Still, this could be an option for some people.
If You Have Other Assets
Reverse mortgages may be of greatest appeal to people who lack retirement accounts, nonretirement investment accounts, or adequate cash savings, making their home their only significant financial asset.
For example, if you know your heirs would like to inherit your home, drawing on those other assets for income could make more sense than running up a large balance on a reverse mortgage. On the other hand, if your heirs don’t have any particular attachment to the home, borrowing against it can be a way to preserve your other assets for them.
Wade Pfau, author of Reverse Mortgages: How to Use Reverse Mortgages to Secure Your Retirement,notes that having a reverse mortgage to draw on is one way to protect your other assets in a bear market. Rather than being forced to sell investments when prices are down to supplement your income, you can tap the reverse mortgage for income until prices rise again.6 Of course, you’ll pay a price for that flexibility in terms of the reverse mortgage’s steep up-front costs.7
A reverse mortgage might also help protect your other assets if you ever face major long-term care costs. Bear in mind, though, that the mortgage will have to be repaid if you move out of the home and into a care facility for 12 consecutive months or more, unless you have a co-borrowing or an eligible non-borrowing spouse living in it.8
How Much Can You Borrow With a Reverse Mortgage?
How much you can borrow with a reverse mortgage depends on your age (or the age of your co-borrowing or eligible non-borrowing spouse, if they’re younger than you), the equity you have in your home, and current interest rates. The current maximum for a government-insured HECM is $970,800.7
Where Can You Get a Reverse Mortgage?
To get a HECM (the most common type of reverse mortgage), you must go through a lender approved by the FHA. There is a search tool for locating lenders on the website of the FHA’s parent organization, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).9
At What Age Do Most People Get Reverse Mortgages?
While you’re eligible for a reverse mortgage at age 62, most people who get one wait until later. A Consumer Financial Protection Bureau study found that in 2019, the latest year for which data is available, the median age of reverse mortgage borrowers was 73.10
The Bottom Line
Your home may represent a significant part of your estate and having a reverse mortgage on it will affect how much of its value your heirs will receive when you die. If you have financial assets in addition to your home, supplementing your income with a reverse mortgage can help you preserve them for your estate. Because your heirs will generally be responsible for paying off the loan when you die, it’s worth discussing the situation with them well in advance.
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley SaundersReverse Mortgages and Estate Planning
Higher inflation means advisors need to be more efficient in positioning client assets for retirement, says Wade Pfau, professor of retirement income at the American College of Financial Services and a prolific author, his most recent book being the “Retirement Planning Guidebook.” He also writes the Retirement Research blog with Bob French and Alex Murguia.
In our ongoing VIP series, Pfau noted that using reserve funds was a good way for retirees to get through this higher inflationary period. Here are his responses to our series of questions.
Inflation has jumped 7.9% over the last 12 months. How would you counsel advisors to prepare clients for either pre- or post-retirement portfolios with this threat? What are the best options now?
Higher inflation requires being more efficient with positioning assets for retirement expenses. Rather than using traditional bonds, [Treasury inflation-protected securities] will help manage high inflation, and annuities with lifetime income can provide an extra kicker beyond the bond interest alone. A well-diversified investment portfolio, over time, provides opportunity to keep pace with inflation.
The Social Security COLA, which was raised to 5.9% this year, is now lagging current inflation rates. What is the best way for advisors to help retirees to counteract the crunch they are taking to their Social Security benefits (especially if they already are collecting benefits)?
Right, the COLAs only happen once a year and so start to lag inflation throughout the year. If some reserve funds are set aside for unanticipated expenses, higher than expected inflation could be a valid use for such funds.
What is your opinion on whether the COLA index should be changed from CPI-W to CPI-Elderly?
I think this is a relatively minor issue and not a pressing need.
Do you believe that Congress will step up and make changes to Social Security, including making the appropriate funding, in the next couple years? Why or why not?
I don’t think we can expect Congress to act on Social Security until we get closer to the deadline when action will be needed, which is still not expected to happen until the early 2030s.
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Ashley SaundersTIPS and Annuities Good Bets When Inflation Is High with Wade Pfau
Recent Comments