Are fixed annuities a safe investment?
I’ve written about annuities from time to time over this low-interest journey, but it never got to the point for me to pull the trigger personally and buy life annuities. It’s generally a bad time to annuitize when interest rates are low. And it’s worse in periods of high inflation. Another attractive benefit of annuities is that they provide some hedge against stock market volatility: you may have noticed that friends with inflation-hedged defined benefit pension plans tend to be less concerned about the current bear market.
In May, pension expert Fred Vettese wrote that retirees may start to be tempted to implement his suggested guideline of converting about 30% of investment portfolios into annuities. As for the timing, he says it is “certainly not now: but it could be sooner than you think.” He suggests the optimal time to commit to them is around May 2023, just under a year from now.
Fee-only financial planner Robb Engen recently wrote about this on Boomer & Echo, where he likened annuities to the creation of your own personal pension plan. He cites a March 2022 RBC Insurance study of Canadians aged 55 to 75. It found that among those already retired, 28% are spending more than they planned for, and 41% have unexpected expenses. Inflation and loss of purchasing power is the most pressing concern for most (78%), along with a lack of guaranteed income (47%), outliving their savings (48%) or their spouse (38%), feelings of loneliness (36%) and not leaving behind a legacy (25%).
Engen was pleasantly surprised by current annuity payouts on $100,000 and $250,000. After the June 1, 2022, rate hike, I asked Cannex Financial Exchanges Ltd. to provide updated quotes for registered life annuities and taxable (proscribed) annuities on comparable amounts. Here’s what it found:
For a 65-year-old male, investing $100,000 early in June 2022, with a 10-year guarantee period in a prescribed (non-registered) single life annuity, monthly income ranged from a high of $548 to $564 at Desjardins Financial Security, with a cluster at major bank and life insurance companies between $538 and $542. (All figures rounded.) Comparable payouts on $250,000 ranged from $1,299 to $1,390.
Because of their greater longevity, 65-year-old females received slightly less—ranging from around $500 per month to a high of $518, and for the $250,000 version, from $1,238 to $1,319.
Here’s what Cannex provides for comparable registered annuities (held in RRSPs):
Income on non-registered accounts
Investor | Investment Amount | Monthly Income |
65-year-old male | $100,000 early in June 2022, 10-year guarantee period in a prescribed (non-registered) single-life annuity | $538 to $542 |
65-year-old female | $100,000 early in June 2022, 10-year guarantee period in a prescribed (non-registered) single-life annuity | $500 to $518 |
Income on registered accounts
65-year-old male | $100,000 early in June 2022, 10-year guarantee period in registered single-life annuity | $551 to $570 |
65-year-old female | $100,000 early in June 2022, 10-year guarantee period in registered single-life annuity | $518 to $531 |
What are the different types of annuities?
As for whether to go the registered or prescribed route, for some, there’s little choice. All they have are registered investments. However, for those with significant taxable investments, fee-only planner Rona Birenbaum, of Caring for Clients, prefers “non-registered to replace non-registered fixed income… Annuities are particularly compelling for investors with taxable portfolios… The tax efficiency of non-registered prescribed annuities is hard to beat when compared to GICs and other conservative fixed-income investments.”
Choosing guaranteed periods reduces the risk of estate erosion in the case of premature death, and the lower taxable income can protect investors from Old Age Security (OAS) clawback.
Birenbaum says that leaving more to your estate and/or heirs by paying more for a longer guarantee period—say, 10 years or more—is worth the cost. Take a 65-year-old couple with a joint last-to-die annuity, non-reducing, which means payments continue for the life of both annuitants without reduction of payments upon the first death. A 20-year guarantee ensures that even if both pass away soon after this purchase, named beneficiaries would receive the remaining payments until 20 years of payments have been made. A $100,000 investment at Desjardins would yield $484 a month, of which only $176 a month is taxable. At a 20% tax rate, that would yield net annual cash flow of $450 a month.
Compare that to a GIC paying 4%, which generates $266 a month net of taxes. That’s “a big difference, especially if it helps avoid OAS clawback,” Birenbaum says. And if you value leaving a larger estate, then a slightly higher payment for a longer guarantee period for your heirs could pay off, depending when you die.
“I prefer a longer guarantee period than shorter. For example, if we used a 10-year guarantee in the example, the net monthly cash flow would be $455 a month. Only $5 per month more in cash flow to get $58,000 more in guaranteed payments if the annuitants die in year 10.”
Matthew Ardrey, wealth advisor for Toronto-based TriDelta Financial, says his firm has felt that annuity rates have been too low for some years, because interest rates are too low. “Does the rising rate environment change that? My answer would be not yet. Rates are still well below what they were when COVID hit—1.75% in Feb 2020, versus 1.00% today.” Also, he says, it’s likely we are going to get more hikes this year. Based on that alone, “I would wait for further rate increases before locking in my savings.”
What about timing?
Just as you could invest in both registered and prescribed annuities, you can also hedge on the timing of when to purchase annuities. Finance professor Moshe Milevsky, who is writing a book on the history of annuities (following his co-authored Pensionize Your Nest Egg), advises investors to inch slowly into committing to annuities.
“I have no idea where long-term rates (the important ones) are heading, even if you have a clear vision of the Bank of Canada’s plans… when it comes to annuities and annuitization, the mathematics are more favourable to acting slow versus all at once.”
In 2016, Milevsky likened the gradual inching into annuities to the dollar-cost averaging of stocks: “In fact, the optimal behaviour of a risk-averse consumer resembles an asymmetric dollar-cost averaging strategy,” he wrote in a co-authored academic paper titled “A Glide Path for Target Date Fund Annuitization.”
As for Vettese’s recommendation of annuitizing around 30% of your retirement assets, Milevsky says that sounds “good and prudent, which these days appear to be enough to allocate to anything.”
MoneySense Investing Editor at Large Jonathan Chevreau is also founder of the Financial Independence Hub, author of Findependence Day and co-author of Victory Lap Retirement. He can be reached at jonathan@findependenceHub.com.
READ MORE: https://www.moneysense.ca/columns/retired-money/rising-rates-longevity-insurance-for-retirees/
Receive Updates
Show Sponsors
The discussion is not meant to provide any legal, tax, or investment advice with respect to the purchase of an insurance product. A comprehensive evaluation of a consumer’s needs and financial situation should always occur in order to help determine if an insurance product may be appropriate for each unique situation.
Leave a Reply